•  
  •  
 

Pacific Studies Journal

Abstract

This essay interrogates the colonial legacy and contemporary consequences of blood quantum laws in defining Native Hawaiian identity, focusing on the exclusionary impact of the 1921 Hawaiian Homes Commission Act’s 50% rule. Through personal reflection and political critique, it examines how these policies fragment genealogical connection, displace indigenous knowledge systems, and fuel internalized anxieties about authenticity and extinction. Drawing on statements by sovereignty leaders Mililani Trask and Lynette Cruz, the essay explores how nationalist calls to ho‘oulu lāhui (reproduce the nation) place disproportionate reproductive burdens on Hawaiian women, often framed within heteronormative, racialized, and even eugenicist logics. While Trask emphasizes population recovery through same-blood mating, Cruz urges the documentation of full-blood Hawaiian births as a survival strategy, both revealing how cultural preservation narratives can marginalize non-traditional families and queer identities. The essay challenges the fetishization of “pure” bodies and calls instead for a return to Hawaiian genealogical practices grounded in ancestry, land, and relationality. Ultimately, it advocates for a sovereignty movement that embraces reproductive justice, affirms bodily autonomy, and resists colonial definitions of belonging—insisting that Hawaiian identity cannot be reduced to fractions, but must be rooted in connection, community, and collective care.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.